Table 4KQ1 summary of findings and strength of evidence for teacher ratings

KQ1 Diagnostic TestOutcomeNumber of Studies and IDsFindingsReasons for DowngradingSoE
KQ1 Teacher RatingsSensitivity17 studies18, 119, 183, 218, 242, 299, 301, 314, 359, 479, 482, 527, 528, 558, 559, 587, 642

Sensitivity ranged from 70% using the BASC-3 (corresponding specificity 73%)642 to 92% using the ADHD-RS (corresponding specificity 88%)299 differentiating ADHD and neurotypical development

Sensitivity ranged from 40% using the SNAP-IV (corresponding specificity 71%)482 to 97% using the SNAP-IV (corresponding specificity 26%)314 in clinical samples

S, ILow
KQ1 TRFSensitivity3 studies242, 301, 587Reported sensitivity ranged from 72% (corresponding specificity 75%)301 to 79% (corresponding specificity 64%)587S, CLow
KQ1 SNAP-IVSensitivity2 studies314, 482Reported sensitivity ranged from 40% (corresponding specificity 71%)482 to 97% (corresponding specificity 26%)314S, CLow
KQ1 Teacher RatingsSpecificity16 studies18, 119, 183, 218, 242, 299, 301, 314, 359, 482, 527, 528, 558, 559, 587, 642

Specificity ranged from 55% using the DBD (corresponding sensitivity 82%)528 to 88% for the ADHD-RS (corresponding sensitivity 92%)299 differentiating ADHD and neurotypical development

Specificity ranged from 48% using the CTRS-R (corresponding sensitivity 82%)183 to 91% for the TRF aggressive behavior scale (corresponding sensitivity 48%)301 in clinical samples

S, ILow
KQ1 TRFSpecificity4 studies242, 301, 342, 587Reported specificity ranged from 64%587 to 76%242S, CLow
KQ1 SNAP-IVSpecificity2 studies314, 482Reported specificity ranged from 26% (corresponding sensitivity 97%)314 to 71% (corresponding sensitivity 40%)482S, CLow
KQ1 Teacher RatingsAccuracy4 studies18, 299, 559, 587

Accuracy was 91%299 using the ADHD-RS to differentiate ADHD and neurotypical development

Accuracy ranged from 69 using the ECI-4559 to 76% using the TRF587 in clinical samples

CLow
KQ1 Teacher RatingsAUC5 studies218, 301, 342, 359, 479

AUC was 0.83 using the BASC-2359 differentiating ADHD and neurotypical development

AUC ranged from 0.65 for TRF342 to 0.84 for the ADHD RS-IV teacher rating inattention scale479 in clinical samples

S, ILow
KQ1 TRFAUC2 studies301, 342AUC ranged from 0.65%342 to 0.77 when combined with Conners-3-T(S)301S, CLow
KQ1 Teacher RatingsRater agreement4 studies218, 362, 391, 463

In clinical samples:

Correlations between teacher and parent ratings ranged from 0.17 to 0.41 over four subscales on the CHAOS scale,391 the reported kappa range was 0.29 between teacher and parent ratings on the ADHD RS-IV,362 up to 0.68 for Symptom Inventories Teacher rating463; ICCs comparing teacher and parent scores of the Conners rating scales were 0.19218

S, ILow
KQ1 Teacher RatingsInternal consistency6 studies218, 342, 359, 391, 527, 528

In neurotypical samples:

Cronbach’s alpha 0.94 for both teacher-rated inattention and hyperactivity symptom counts on the DBD528

Cronbach’s alpha was 0.95 for BASC-2359

Cronbach’s alpha was 0.94 for the DBD527

In clinical samples:

Cronbach’s alpha was 0.95 for the TRF attention problems subscale342; Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.64 to 0.91 over four subscales of the CHAOS scale391, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.80 for CTRS-R218

S, ILow
KQ1 Teacher RatingsTest-retest reliability1 study391Pearson correlations ranged from 0.74 to 0.87 over four subscales of the CHAOS scale, retest between 1 and 829 days391 in a clinical sampleCLow
KQ1 Teacher RatingsMisdiagnosis impact0 studiesNo dataCInsufficient
KQ1 Teacher RatingsCosts0 studiesNo dataCInsufficient

Notes: AUC = area under the curve, KQ = Key Question, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 4th edition, ASEBA = Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment, BASC = Behavior Assessment System for Children, C = inconsistency, CHAOS = Hyperactive-Attention Problem- Oppositional Symptom, CTRS-R = Connor Teacher Rating Scale Revised, DBD = Disruptive Behavior Disorder rating scale, I = imprecision, S = study limitation, SNAP-IV = Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Questionnaire, SoE = strength of evidence, TRF = Teacher Report Form

From: 4, Results: Diagnosis of ADHD

Cover of ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children and Adolescents
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children and Adolescents [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Review, No. 267.
Peterson BS, Trampush J, Maglione M, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.