U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Lamina T, Abdi HI, Behrens K, et al. Strategies To Address Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health and Healthcare: An Evidence Map [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2024 Mar. (Technical Brief, No. 46.)

Cover of Strategies To Address Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health and Healthcare: An Evidence Map

Strategies To Address Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health and Healthcare: An Evidence Map [Internet].

Show details

1Introduction

1.1. Background

For at least three decades, a growing body of evidence has documented the problem of health and healthcare disparities, defined as preventable differences in disease burden, injury, violence, or opportunities to achieve optimal health among socially disadvantaged populations.1 Health disparities have reached crisis proportions among racial and ethnic groups across the United States.2 The COVID-19 pandemic, which further exposed and worsened healthcare inequities, led to a renewed call for action and accountability.3 Data show that racially and ethnically minoritized people have higher rates of morbidity and mortality across many health conditions, including chronic conditions such as mental health disorders, cardiovascular disease (including hypertension), cancer, asthma, HIV/AIDS, renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes.4 Broadly, in most examinations of long-term health and healthcare disparities, African Americans/Blacks fare worse than all other groups in health outcomes.5

Figure 1 provides a conceptual framework drawn from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) Research Framework and the work of Purnell and colleagues, both of which consider the many factors that influence disparities in health and healthcare.6, 7 Racial and ethnic disparities occur in the context of broader inequality and are directly related to the historical and current unequal distribution of social, political, economic, environmental, educational, and healthcare factors and systems.8 These include economic policies and systems, development agendas, social norms, social policies, structural racism and discrimination, climate change, healthcare financing, and political structures that shape the conditions in which people are born, work, live, learn, play, worship, and grow older—factors and systems also known as social determinants of health.

Figure 1 is a diagram of a conceptual framework that illustrates the drivers of and interventions for health and healthcare disparities. The framework contains a box across the full diagram containing a box reading “Unequal distribution of systems and factors” and under that box, reading left to right are six categories in individual boxes, Social, Political, Healthcare, Economic, Environmental and Education. Under Healthcare an arrow points down to a box reading “Racial and Ethnic Healthcare Disparities”. Under Racial and Ethnic Healthcare Disparities an arrow points to Organzational/Institutional Level factors, Clinician Level factors, and Patient Level factors. All three of these boxes point to the right to a box containing Single-level interventions or Multi-level interventions. This then points to the right to outcomes: process of care, clinical outcomes, patient experience of care, equity of service, care utilization, cost/financial reimbursement.

Figure 1

Understanding the drivers of and interventions for health and healthcare disparities.

Within this conceptual framework, healthcare-related factors are a critical concern. Addressing racial and ethnic health and healthcare disparities in the United States would not only eliminate much unnecessary human suffering, but also decrease healthcare expenditures. Health disparities are estimated to account for $93 billion in excess medical care costs and $42 billion in untapped productivity.9 Specifically, to reduce healthcare expenditures, healthcare systems can focus on patient, clinician, and healthcare system factors (Figure 1).10, 11 Patient factors that might affect disparities include individual beliefs and preferences, health behaviors, and mitigating the impact of social determinants of health (e.g., housing, education, employment, socio-economic status).10 Clinician factors can include knowledge, attitudes, racial bias, implicit or not, practice, and financial incentives. Healthcare system factors can include healthcare organizational culture, quality improvement, and elements of the healthcare system (e.g., organization, financing, care delivery).10

The federal government has contributed important work to draw attention to and support efforts to reduce disparities. The Department of Health and Human Services’ Healthy People 2000 established national objectives for improving health and well-being that recognized health equity as a goal.12 Since then, efforts to eliminate disparities have increased. The President’s Office recently signed an executive order on Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government, followed by the release of actionable recommendations in the Health Equity Task Force report.13, 14 However, much remains to be done, given that many factors contribute to disparities.

Healthcare strategies/interventions might offer ways to address racial and ethnic health and healthcare disparities. Our conceptual framework suggests that healthcare strategies/interventions may be complex in design and implementation. They may take place at a single level (i.e., target only one part of the healthcare system such as solely patients, solely clinicians, or solely the healthcare organization) or involve multiple levels of the healthcare system (i.e., target more than one part of the healthcare system such as both clinicians and the healthcare organization).

1.2. Purpose and Scope

Our report supplements an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) 2012 report that examined the effectiveness of quality improvement interventions in reducing disparities in health and healthcare on a limited set of clinical conditions.15 Here we expand the scope of that report by including an unrestricted set of chronic conditions in adults. Also, the 2012 report only included studies if they directly compared a population that was experiencing disparities with a population that was not in order to determine whether the intervention closed the distance between the two groups’ health outcomes. We did not constrain the intervention comparisons to populations only, which allowed a broader range of healthcare strategies/interventions to be examined.

This Technical Brief presents an evidence map based on a systematic search of the recent literature on healthcare strategies/interventions for reducing racial and ethnic disparities and improving health outcomes in the prevention/treatment of chronic conditions in adults. The aim is to identify existing interventions that could be considered for implementation by healthcare system leaders and policymakers, and to inform researchers and funding agencies on gaps in knowledge and research needs.

1.3. Guiding Questions

We developed the questions below in collaboration with AHRQ to guide our mapping of the available evidence.

What is the current evidence for strategies designed to reduce racial and ethnic disparities and improve health outcomes in the prevention/treatment of chronic conditions in adults?

  1. What interventions have been studied?
  2. What racial and ethnic populations have been studied?
  3. What common (multiple and single) chronic conditions have been studied?
  4. What primary outcomes have been studied?
  5. What are the reported effects (that is, a summary of the direction of effects) of the strategies used in studies of interventions to reduce disparities?
  6. What are the reported unintended consequences, harms, or adverse events of the strategies used in studies of interventions to reduce disparities?
  7. Within race/ethnic groups, what other intersectional influences (e.g., income, sexual orientation, geographic location, language, gender) have been targeted in studies of interventions to reduce disparities?
  8. What study designs have been used?
  9. What information is available on the applicability and sustainability of interventions?
  10. What gaps exist in the current research?

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (2.9M)

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...