NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
In February 2020, this guideline was updated by an expert committee. They reviewed the evidence on increasing ICS treatment within supported self-management for children and young people. See the NICE website for the guideline recommendations and the evidence review for the 2020 update. This document includes the 2017 evidence reviews and committee discussions and has not been updated.
Excerpt
This guideline offers best practice advice on the care of people with suspected asthma presenting with respiratory symptoms, and monitoring asthma control in people with a confirmed diagnosis of asthma. Chapters 6 to 10 review the diagnostic accuracy of the initial clinical assessment questions for the diagnosis of asthma in people with suspected asthma presenting with respiratory symptoms. Chapters 11 to 20 review the diagnostic test accuracy of objective tests for the diagnosis of asthma in people with suspected asthma presenting with respiratory symptoms. The diagnostic pathway can be found in section 4.1. Chapters 23 to 30 review the clinical and cost-effectiveness of interventions used to monitor asthma control.
Contents
- Guideline committee members
- NGC technical team members
- Acknowledgements
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Development of the guideline
- 3. Methods
- 4. Guideline summary
- 5. Diagnosing asthma
- 6. Diagnosis: Signs and symptoms
- 7. Diagnosis: History of atopic disorders
- 8. Diagnosis: Symptoms after exercise
- 9. Diagnosis: Symptoms after using medication
- 10. Diagnosis: Occupational asthma
- 10.1. Introduction
- 10.2. Review question: In adults under investigation for occupational asthma, what is the diagnostic accuracy for case identification, of asking whether their symptoms are better away from work?
- 10.3. Clinical evidence
- 10.4. Economic evidence
- 10.5. Evidence statements
- 10.6. Recommendations and link to evidence
- 11. Diagnosis: Spirometry
- 12. Diagnosis: Bronchodilator reversibility
- 12.1. Introduction
- 12.2. Review question: In people under investigation for asthma, what is the diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of bronchodilator response (using PEF or FEV1)?
- 12.3. Clinical evidence
- 12.4. Economic evidence
- 12.5. Evidence statements
- 12.6. Recommendations and link to evidence
- 13. Diagnosis: Peak expiratory flow variability
- 14. Diagnosis: Skin prick tests
- 15. Diagnosis: Serum IgE measures
- 16. Diagnosis: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)
- 16.1. Introduction
- 16.2. Review question: In people under investigation for asthma, what is the diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measures?
- 16.3. Clinical evidence
- 16.4. Economic evidence
- 16.5. Evidence statements
- 16.6. Recommendations and link to evidence
- 17. Diagnosis: Peripheral blood eosinophil count
- 18. Diagnosis: Direct bronchial challenge test with histamine and methacholine
- 18.1. Introduction
- 18.2. Review question: In people under investigation for asthma, what is the diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of airway hyper-reactivity (non-specific bronchial challenge) with histamine and methacholine?
- 18.3. Clinical evidence
- 18.4. Economic evidence
- 18.5. Evidence statements
- 18.6. Recommendations and link to evidence
- 19. Diagnosis: Indirect bronchial challenge test with mannitol
- 19.1. Introduction
- 19.2. Review question: In people under investigation for asthma, what is the diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of airway hyper-reactivity (non-specific bronchial challenge) with mannitol?
- 19.3. Clinical evidence
- 19.4. Economic evidence
- 19.5. Evidence statements
- 19.6. Recommendations and link to evidence
- 20. Diagnosis: Indirect bronchial challenge test with exercise
- 21. Diagnostic summaries
- 22. Monitoring asthma control
- 23. Monitoring: Symptom scores and questionnaires
- 23.1. Introduction
- 23.2. Review question: In people with asthma, what is the clinical and cost-effectiveness of using symptom scores / diaries or validated questionnaires measuring symptom control (eg ACT, ACQ, CACT, RCP 3 questions) and / or health related quality of life (eg AQLQ, PAQLQ) to monitor asthma?
- 23.3. Clinical evidence
- 23.4. Economic evidence
- 23.5. Evidence statements
- 23.6. Recommendations and link to evidence
- 24. Monitoring: Lung function tests
- 24.1. Introduction
- 24.2. Review question: In people with asthma, what is the clinical and cost-effectiveness of using measures of pulmonary function assessing asthma control (for example, spirometry and peak expiratory flow) to monitor asthma?
- 24.3. Clinical evidence
- 24.4. Economic evidence
- 24.5. Evidence statements
- 24.6. Recommendations and link to evidence
- 25. Monitoring: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)
- 25.1. Introduction
- 25.2. Review question: In people with asthma, what is the clinical and cost-effectiveness of using fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measures for monitoring asthma control?
- 25.3. Clinical evidence
- 25.4. Economic evidence
- 25.5. Evidence statements
- 25.6. Recommendations and link to evidence
- 26. Monitoring: Peripheral blood eosinophil count
- 27. Monitoring: Challenge tests
- 27.1. Introduction
- 27.2. Review question: In people with asthma, what is the clinical and cost-effectiveness of using indirect challenge tests with mannitol or direct challenge tests with histamine or methacholine for monitoring asthma control?
- 27.3. Clinical evidence
- 27.4. Economic evidence
- 27.5. Evidence statements
- 27.6. Recommendations and link to evidence
- 28. Monitoring adherence to treatment
- 29. Monitoring inhaler technique
- 30. Monitoring: Tele-healthcare
- 31. Reference list
- 32. Acronyms and abbreviations
- 33. Glossary
- Appendices
- Appendix A. Scope
- Appendix B. Declarations of interest
- Appendix C. Review protocols
- Appendix D. Clinical article selection
- Appendix E. Economic article selection
- Appendix F. Literature search strategies
- Appendix G. Clinical evidence tables
- Appendix H. Economic evidence tables
- Appendix I. GRADE tables
- Appendix J. Forest plots
- Appendix K. Excluded clinical studies
- Appendix L. Excluded economic studies
- Appendix M. Cost-effectiveness analysis: Diagnosis of asthma in adults and young people aged over 16
- Appendix N. Research recommendations
- Appendix O. Contributors to the guideline
- Appendix P. References
- Appendix Q. Feasibility report
- Appendix R. Summary of evidence from 2017 updated searches for Asthma: diagnosis and monitoring
Final version
Commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Disclaimer: Healthcare professionals are expected to take NICE clinical guidelines fully into account when exercising their clinical judgement. However, the guidance does not override the responsibility of healthcare professionals to make decisions appropriate to the circumstances of each patient, in consultation with the patient and/or their guardian or carer.
- Interferon gamma release assays for Diagnostic Evaluation of Active tuberculosis (IDEA): test accuracy study and economic evaluation.[Health Technol Assess. 2019]Interferon gamma release assays for Diagnostic Evaluation of Active tuberculosis (IDEA): test accuracy study and economic evaluation.Takwoingi Y, Whitworth H, Rees-Roberts M, Badhan A, Partlett C, Green N, Boakye A, Lambie H, Marongiu L, Jit M, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2019 May; 23(23):1-152.
- Review Measurement of exhaled nitric oxide concentration in asthma: a systematic review and economic evaluation of NIOX MINO, NIOX VERO and NObreath.[Health Technol Assess. 2015]Review Measurement of exhaled nitric oxide concentration in asthma: a systematic review and economic evaluation of NIOX MINO, NIOX VERO and NObreath.Harnan SE, Tappenden P, Essat M, Gomersall T, Minton J, Wong R, Pavord I, Everard M, Lawson R. Health Technol Assess. 2015 Oct; 19(82):1-330.
- Lead-I ECG for detecting atrial fibrillation in patients with an irregular pulse using single time point testing: a systematic review and economic evaluation.[Health Technol Assess. 2020]Lead-I ECG for detecting atrial fibrillation in patients with an irregular pulse using single time point testing: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Duarte R, Stainthorpe A, Greenhalgh J, Richardson M, Nevitt S, Mahon J, Kotas E, Boland A, Thom H, Marshall T, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jan; 24(3):1-164.
- Review Procalcitonin testing to guide antibiotic therapy for the treatment of sepsis in intensive care settings and for suspected bacterial infection in emergency department settings: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.[Health Technol Assess. 2015]Review Procalcitonin testing to guide antibiotic therapy for the treatment of sepsis in intensive care settings and for suspected bacterial infection in emergency department settings: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.Westwood M, Ramaekers B, Whiting P, Tomini F, Joore M, Armstrong N, Ryder S, Stirk L, Severens J, Kleijnen J. Health Technol Assess. 2015 Nov; 19(96):v-xxv, 1-236.
- Review Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tests for the diagnosis and investigation of urinary tract infection in children: a systematic review and economic model.[Health Technol Assess. 2006]Review Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tests for the diagnosis and investigation of urinary tract infection in children: a systematic review and economic model.Whiting P, Westwood M, Bojke L, Palmer S, Richardson G, Cooper J, Watt I, Glanville J, Sculpher M, Kleijnen J. Health Technol Assess. 2006 Oct; 10(36):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-154.
- AsthmaAsthma
- Nucleotide Links for Protein (Select 2462505910) (0)Nucleotide
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...