Structured Abstract

Contents

• Preface
• Acknowledgments
• Key Informants
• Technical Expert Panel
• Peer Reviewers
• Evidence Summary
• Introduction
  • Background
  • Scope and Key Questions
  • Organization of This Report
• Methods
  • Topic Refinement and Review Protocol
  • Literature Search Strategy
  • Quality Assessment of Individual Studies
  • Data Synthesis
  • Strength of the Body of Evidence
  • Applicability
  • Peer Review and Public Commentary
• Results
  • Introduction
  • Results of Literature Searches
  • Description of Included Studies
  • Key Question 1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Depression Screening Tests in Post–Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients
  • Key Question 2. Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Depression Treatments in Post-ACS Patients
• Discussion
  • Findings in Relation to Other Reviews on Depression Screening and Treatment After ACS
  • Applicability
  • Implications for Clinical and Policy Decisionmaking
  • Limitations of the Systematic Review Process and Evidence Base
  • Research Recommendations
  • Conclusions
• References
• Acronyms and Abbreviations
• Appendix A. FDA Status and Warnings for Drugs Included in This Review
• Appendix B. Exact Search Strings
• Appendix C. Data Abstraction Elements
• Appendix D. List of Included Studies
• Appendix E. List of Excluded Studies
• Appendix F. Key to Included Primary and Companion Articles
• Appendix G. Characteristics of Included Studies

Suggested citation:

Williams JW Jr, Nieuwsma JA, Namdari N, Washam JB, Raitz G, Blumenthal JA, Jiang W, Yapa R, McBroom AJ, Lallinger K, Schmidt R, Kosinski AS, Sanders GD. Diagnostic Accuracy of Screening and Treatment of Post–Acute Coronary Syndrome Depression: A Systematic Review. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 200. (Prepared by the Duke University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2015-00004-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 18-EHC001-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; November 2017. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23970/AHRQEPCCER200.

This report is based on research conducted by the Duke Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-2015-00004-I). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. Therefore, no statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

None of the investigators have any affiliations or financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this report.

The information in this report is intended to help health care decisionmakers—patients and clinicians, health system leaders, and policymakers, among others—make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for the application of clinical judgment. Anyone who makes decisions concerning the provision of clinical care should consider this report in the same way as any medical reference and in conjunction with all other pertinent information, i.e., in the context of available resources and circumstances presented by individual patients.

AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of any derivative products that may be developed from this report, such as clinical practice guidelines, other quality enhancement tools, or reimbursement or coverage policies, may not be stated or implied.

This report may periodically be assessed for the currency of conclusions. If an assessment is done, the resulting surveillance report describing the methodology and findings will be found on the Effective Health Care Program Web site at www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov. Search on the title of the report.

1

5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; www​.ahrq.gov